iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
Return to the Circle Theater Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Lost

Posted by moongirl0719 (My Page) on
Fri, Nov 19, 04 at 10:51

I know sometimes we discuss tv on here, and I'm surprised no one has brought this up yet. Is anyone else addicted to this show? In some ways it's so cliche, and yet, somehow, it's incredibly refreshing. Man, how do they do it? It's great!


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Lost

I really enjoy it too. I'm so sick of reality and medical investigation tv. I'm just happy to have an interesting drama.

"Lost" is really done well. I like how they focus on a different character each week and how most have a little twist to their individual stories. I also like how they make the island so mysterious. The show sort of reminds me a little of the "Land of the Lost" and of course, "The Lord of the Flies" (Two of my favorites).

I think I read somewhere that there is suppose to be a connection between all of the characters...not sure if it's true, but it may help explain things.

I think the fact that there are so many things that are not resolved leaves us to ask questions and want more. It seems that, in this day and age, most shows feel compelled to have to resolve all the problems in one episode. Either that, or they move at a soap opera's snail's pace so that you lose interest. "Lost" seems to pace things just right, IMHO.


 o
RE: Lost

I love it too and I rarely watch tv shows. I haven't seen this week's episode yet but I Tivo'd it. I hear that we finally get a glimpse of the island's mysterious residents? I figure that they all have a connection somehow but I don't try to figure it out. The thought has occurred to me that maybe they are all dead? Anyway, I think it is a great show and very well done.


 o
RE: Lost

I've been downloading episodes because I got addicted to this show when I got a free cable trial, but I'm not paying $20 a month for one show :P The only other thing I watch is Law and Order and that comes on my one channel four times a week :D

Its a refreshing show, to be sure, which is rare enough to make it worth watching, if just for that.


 o
RE: Lost

I watched an episode and part of another and just couldn't get into this one. Maybe when they start the reruns I'll be more in tune with it. Maybe it is all the flashbacks of the characters lives.


 o
RE: Lost

At first I really enjoyed this show, but as watch more and more episodes I'm starting to think it's getting hokey. That being said, I'll probably continue tuning in just to oggle Matthew Fox and hope the plot doesn't crash like the plane did!

I did really enjoy "House" with Hugh Laurie on Tuesday. It's like "Medical Investigation" but with more of a story. Needless to say, I will thoroughly cook all my pork from now on!


 o
RE: Lost

I really like the originality of this new show. And somewhere in the early episodes there was the hint (from the hunter) that each person would face his or her demons on this island (the fear of fear, drug addiction, an estranged and now deceased parent, terrible pasts... and deep dark secrets...) Lots of new twists, I agree. How refreshing!

So what happened with the 'Langalier-type' machine things? We haven't seen/heard much about them since the early episodes.


 o
RE: Lost

I wouldn't watch the very first episode (I couldn't handle seeing the plane crash) but after that I got into it. I'm so into it now. True, in some ways it's getting a little hokey, I mean, after a while, practically every show on tv becomes a soap opera of sorts, but it's still refreshing and I love the plot twists and the back stories are brilliant. The producers call it a cross between Gilligan's Island, Survivor and X-Files (bc supposedly there are some otherwordly like things going on)

I have to say, tho - I HATED this past week's episode! SPOILER!!!

What was up with that crazy lady? I thought the whole thing was weird. the way they interacted, and then she tied him up and then she killed her whole family....I feel that it would have been worth something if she went with him but I just kept thinking, what was the point of the writers doing this? Why did they write this character?

My husband did point out, tho, that it may explain some of the strange animals on the island, like the polar bear, bc she and her crew were studying them.


 o
RE: Lost

moongirl,

spoilers ahead for last episode...

I am still not 100% sure what we are suppose to think happened to the people with the crazy lady ( I think her name is Danielle). I'm not sure if she just down and out killed the others because she was crazy, or if they got some strange disease, that either killed them or made them crazy and she had to kill them. It appears to me that Danielle thinks Alex is still alive. Maybe Alex left because Danielle was so crazy or maybe Alex is the crazy one. Even though Danielle seemed so crazy, Sayid did hear the voices too, so maybe in reality she was the only sane one left in the group. What do you guys think?

Additionally, I think Alex may be a girl, not boy since the Danielle referred to Alex as "her child". I think that Alex may have been the person who knocked out Sayid a couple weeks ago.

I hope/think Alex will figure into the future storyline and so will Danielle. It does seems a little odd to have another person (Danielle) living on the island alone and to just leave her like that, even if she is crazy. The writers seemed to treat her like just another storyline...like the "invisible dinosaur" or "the polar bear". I agree, I thought the lack of perceived followup on her character seemed very off.

Can anyone explain the specifics behind the cable? Was is suppose to be supplying power to her after all those years? Thanks


 o
RE: Lost

Possible spoilers ahead:

I was reading something yesterday and the writer suggested that they were all in the Bermuda Triangle?


 o
RE: Lost

I've heard things like that too, about the Bermuda Triangle idea. But I guess we will never know.

Good point about "my child" - could be son - or daughter?

Also, I think she is so dillusional, that for all we know, she could have killed her kid but has blocked it out in her mind, and has convinced herself into thinking the child is still alive. DH and I were trying to figure it out, the kid has to be AT LEAST 16, right? Since she's been on the island 16 years. Did she say if the child was a baby when they got there? For all we know the kid could have been 6, or 10, or 12, which would make Alex much older than 16.

I am not sure either about the whole cable thing.. how did she manage to generate a battery for 16 years?

I think Sayid DID honestly hear voices/whispers/or whatever they are, because I think he has proven himself (from what we've seen) to be a pretty sound guy.

I do think Danielle's presence does explain the polar bear. in fact, the polar bear could have even been a baby when they got stranded but is grown up now.

Well, I found her character insufferable, really annoying...and I just couldn't for the life of me figure out why the writers would create her. I would imagine that she will come in later. It would have been helpful in some ways if she joined him back at the camp, her survival skills, her knowledge of the island, would have come in handy.


 o
RE: Lost

That's weird. I never once consider that Alex might be a girl. I thought boy from the start, and I believe Alex is Ethan, the guy who kidnapped Charlie and the pregnant woman.

The show is very good. Each week I think I'm going to become bored with it, and each week I get more pulled into it. I like the whole Burmuda Triangle angle. Polar bears, dinosaur noises, things that just shouldn't be where they are. It's almost like they are all actually dead and existing in another dimension. 40 people just don't look that good after a plane crash.


 o
RE: Lost

I very much enjoy this show and was screaming at the TV during last week's show. If you saw it, you know why. I have some serious love for Sawyer, Sayid, Charley and Hurley. Jack, I just want to slap up the side of the head on a regular basis. And I was tickled to see Delenn (sp?) from Babylon 5 as the crazy scientist. And now no new shows for a month. Sigh.


 o
RE: Lost

I just couldn't get into that series. I feel the same way about the Survivor shows. To me they are just unreal.


 o
RE: Lost

I really like the way the flashbacks appear during their trying experiences. Like parts of their memory that surge forward from their subconcious. (Hmmm, food for thought)
Too unreal... to NOT watch! (Aw heck, I'm a Dan Lynch fan, what can I tell ya!)

I was really unnerved by Charlie's memory loss. Terror? Selective memory? Ego? Stay tuned, next week, folks, for another episode of... this is a tv show, not a movie... as we here continue to try to analyze it all lol


 o
RE: Lost

I'm hooked.I just hope they can keep up the originality without getting silly.
One point,though.As I understand it,they were flying to the U.S. from Australia across the Pacific,so I don't see how they could have ended up in the Bermuda Triangle no matter how far off course they were.LOL
What I really want to know is what Maggie did to get in trouble with the law.


 o
RE: Lost

Did I say Maggie?
Of course I meant Kate.DUH!
I checked out the ABC site and read the bio for the actress who plays her and it was really amazing.She's probably right at home on the island.


 o
RE: Lost

I didn't mean Burmuda Triangle literally. I was just going for the Twilight Zone feeling. I just feel like they're all existing in another dimension. It it was just people stranded on an island, I'd be bored. The unknown element is what makes it so interesting for me.


 o
RE: Lost

Yes, but who, or what, was responsible for Charlie's recovery? Was it really Jack? Or was it the island? And is Locke creepy or cool? And what's with that cable into the ocean? Is it a communications cable? Does the mad French scientist have some sort of ocean thermal gradient generator of electricity?

Black Cat, have you continued to watch Medical Investigation? That show annoys the dickens out of me. Which is putting it mildly. The lead lady doctor, formerly of The Practice, should be shot and never allowed near a scientific study. When she broke protocol for the benefit of her patient in that first episode I was screaming at the TV. And they were depicting it the "right" thing to do. And the show seems to me to be full of mushy feel-good crap that will lead to unintended consequences. Unintended consequences that are entirely predictable to anyone with half a brain.. Grrrrr.


 o
RE: Lost

Well I'm totally hooked. I have so many questions!!

As much as I disliked the Danielle episode, I believe that she will come back to play a major part. Also, like I said, at least her story would explain the crazy animals. Also she said that there were "others" on the island...and now Sayid believes this also. So this Ethan could be one of "the others" or he could be her son.

Also, did the psychic KNOW that she was going to get stranded on the island? If so, why would he put her on the plane? And how did he know that other people would want the baby? Here's a wild idea - perhaps the baby is going to somehow grow up and be the one to save them/get them off the island, so it was like the baby needs to be there.

The thing that struck me about last week's episode: Charlie said they only wanted the pregnant girl. They obviously want the baby (and we know the connection there bc of what the psychic said.) Doesn't it sound eerily like Rosemary's Baby?


 o
RE: Lost

I just saw a repeat episode of Lost that I had missed. It was "Walkabout", the one that shows Locke's past. I won't go into detail so as to ruin it for anyone who hasn't seen it, but I loved what was revealed about him at the end. Nothing made sense to me about him until that piece of the puzzle. I like how the show forces you to take a look at the whole picture to see why a character acts as he does. It makes you feel foolish for judging them before having all of the facts.

The only thing that bugged me about the show was how a scuba diver drowns in a rip tide at the beginning of "White Rabbit". Wouldn't a scuba diver of all people know how to swim out of a rip tide?


 o
RE: Lost

Sorry rudy,I didn't read your post closely enough the first time and didn't realize you were making an analogy.
I agree that the surreal quality of the show is much more interesting than a simple castaway show would be.
I like real Survivor stories,but in a drama like this I want DRAMA.Mystery isn't bad either.


 o
RE: Lost

ok, I watched those episodes (didn't see it them first time they ran) and I agree, learned lots of fascinating things about Locke. Very eerie and cool.

But the White Rabbit episode, I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't a scuba diver...where did you get that from? I understood it to be just some woman who takes a swim and got pulled out. They never say she was a scuba diver.


 o
RE: Lost

I thought I heard Jack or one of the other castaways say that she is a as scuba diver which is why she likes to go swimming. I'll have to watch it again when it repeats.


 o
RE: Lost

Oh, here's what I recall - when she is spotted out there they don't say who she is or what she's doing out there. Then Jack goes out there to get her and saves the young guy instead, etc. Then later on, Kate tells Jack who the lady was and what she was doing in Australia (and how she knows all this is anyone guess LOL) Maybe it's here that Kate mentions that she was a scuba diver, but I don't remember details. Then later, Jack gives a lecture to everyone about pulling together, and he says something like, "Look what happened when someone went out to take a simple swim, and ended up dead."

Well, I don't remember a scuba diver reference but I could be wrong. If you find out any more info let us know.

Anyway, wasn't the Locke storyline fascinating? So you don't really know if he truly has the skills or if he's just faking it. After all, when they went tracking in a more recent episode, he goes the wrong way, doesn't he? Is he just nuts? Is this hunter/warrior he seems to be just the man he always wanted to be? The man he couldn't get to be on the tour? Seems like it, based on his obsession with war-like games. Now, with the love interest, I was not surprised to learn that he called up "escorts" to keep him company, after all, who was he going to meet in his condition? But the fact that he projected all this love onto the phone-sex lady shows that he does not live in reality.

And speaking of condition, I also thought it was interesting that he only has been handicapped for four years. What about before then? And what caused it? DH postulates that it's psychological, merely for the fact that his legs seem to be in working order.

Or...do his legs suddenly work bc of the island and its magical powers?

One last thing which I am can't get out of my head and think about on a regular basis. In the very first episode, Locke begins to teach Walt, the little boy, how to play backgammon. He says, "One light, one dark.." and holds the pieces up. Then he says, "Do you want to know a secret?"

And then they cut away!!!!!! Is this driving anyone else nuts? What did he say? And it's GOT to be KEY info that they're leaving out!


 o
RE: Lost

I think that in preparation for the Walkabout, Locke studied survival skills intensely. That fits with his gamer personality, too, I think. He has tons of book learning, but he is just now getting the actual experience.

Is the island giving everyone what they secretly want? Locke is getting his great adventure in the wild. Jack gets to demonstrate to his father that he is fully capable. Our Korean wife gets her husband out of her father's clutches. Her husband gets to keep his wife. Charlie is getting a life back. Clair is getting someone else to take the baby. Sawyer is confronting in the rawest way possible the man who destroyed his family by selfish indifference. Okay, maybe not the last. But it is fun to speculate.


 o
RE: Lost

I have gone onto some other Lost sites, including ABC and ezboards. The biggest theories floating around seem to be:

a) they are all dead and waiting in purgatory. They all have things they need to "get past" in their lives, so in purgatory they rise above these things so they can move on in death. Charlie gets over his drug addiction, Locke walks, Jack gets past the guilt over his father's death, etc. The "monster" is their own fears. I am fond of this theory and I personally buy this the most.

2) It's all a dream. Either Jack's dream, or a dream shared by everyone in some existential way. In their fantasy/dream they don't have the problems of real life. Same examples previously listed, plus another is Kate's marshall dies. We have yet to see what the other back stories are.

The problems some people have with the above two theories is that it doesn't explain certain things, like the birth of Claire's baby (how can that happen in a dream?) and the existence of Danielle (also, a dream? unless she's in purgatory too)

3) The oldest conspiracy theory in this country: it's all a secret government plot. Ethan Rom is a humanoid/android (get it, ROM?)

4) Locke is the key to everything. He is somehow the guardian of everyone, helping each person to tap into himself/herself and get over their problems. I personally don't buy this bc a) Locke has his own share of problems and b) I think he is a phony of sorts and living in a bit of a fantasy world of his own.

5) A friend of mine thinks the baby is the anti-Christ and the psychic didn't want the baby to be exposed to the world.

A few little interesting notes:

The psychic said, "Don't let your baby be raised by another." But what I think he really said was, "Don't let your baby be raised be AN OTHER." Lots of references to "The Others" on the island. AND this is interesting - Ethan Rom is an anagram for Other Man.

There seem to also be lots of references to Paradise Lost and George Orwell. Someone had recognized the airline - Oceanic - as a reference from 1984....and apparently the numbers in Boone's tattoo add up to 84. But I personally think this a stretch. Oceanic is like "555" in Hollywood phone numbers, it's just something they use in Hollywood.

Ahhh...so many theories, so little time.

Any other theories or thoughts?


 o
RE: Lost

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't want any of the theories to be true. I love this show and look forward to it every week and, even though I never avoid spoilers when available, in this case I don't want to know what is behind the mystery. I'm not a sci-fi or fantasy fan (except LOTR) and I like realism in my books and movies, but for some reason I can accept a tropical island with polar bears and monsters and people who survive a plane crash with few injuries and 16-year transmissions that have never been heard.


 o
RE: Lost

I think knowing what the mystery is might take all the fun out of watching it. I would prefer the mystery be revealed at the very last episode in the series finale 10 years from now. I'm enjoying the show as is, without knowing and I'm expecting the surprise to be something no one has mentioned.

I am so excited; there is finally a new episode this week!!!!


 o
RE: Lost

Oh me too, of course! I think part of the fun is speculating. It is a real hoot to hear what other people are thinking and noticing and theorizing. Because the reality is that NO ONE knows what the real answer is and won't until the last episode!!!!


 o
RE: Lost

I enjoy speculating, but don't like being spoiled. I saw Terry O'Quinn on TV this a.m. and he told us the director told him, in the scene where whe sees the monster, that he is looking upon the most beautiful thing in the world. He also said that the actors only get enough info for that episode, and sometimes a little more to keep the direction of the character in line with what is planned.

I took Locke to be a reference to John Locke, the anti-Rousseau of philosphy. The natural state of man vs societal man.


 o
RE: Lost

Well these aren't apoliers. These are theories by fans. I think the thing Lost fans share is that we really ENJOY being confused!

Someone else on some board also brought up the idea of Locke = John Locke, but what I find more interesting, is you beinging up Rousseau - isn't that Danielle's last name? Hmmmm.....


 o
Correction

Well these aren't spoilers. These are theories by fans. I think the thing Lost fans share is that we really ENJOY being confused!

Someone else on some board also brought up the idea of Locke = John Locke, but what I find more interesting, is you beinging up Rousseau - isn't that Danielle's last name? Hmmmm.....


 o
RE: Lost

OHMYGOD, it's getting weirder with each new episode!
Wunnerful!

Talk about a stumper with that suitcase, huh? So many twists in the plot! Sexual tension, yet more flashbacks, a little 'sexual preference' info, tsunami tides, gosh! Those writers are awesome!

I wonder what the significance of the miniature plane is? In the Kate flashback scene in the bank vault, we got to see just how good she was with a gun. Hmmmm, secret agent, perhaps? Bring-it-on!


 o
RE: Lost

This episode almost jumped around a little too much for me. I was also a tad disappointed with the biblical woman at the end of it with Charlie. Someone needs to smack her around a little. She spends the first week staring out in the sea with a serious case of PTSD, and now suddenly she's completely at peace with herself and singing in the choir. Me thinks she's been in the sun a bit too long.

They still have quite a bit to tell us about Kate. I guess that guy she shot in the knee wasn't the man she loved since she shot him to get the little airplane.

Any speculation on why the tide changed so quickly?


 o
RE: Lost

Rudy, I'm tending to think Rose is more on target than not.

Pure speculation, but ...

Religious themes have been almost subliminal in this show. I'm beginning to think along the lines of "Once I was lost, but now I'm saved."

And Okay, I have a thing about names. John Locke was just too obvious, Delenn (okay, maybe this is really stretching it, but remember that she was of the spiritual caste on Babylon 5) turns out to be named Rousseau, then we get Ethan Rom. Jack is, of course, John, a biblical name if there ever was one and a last name of Sheppard? Since the beginning, I've had the 23 Psalm running through my head. Think about how many elements fit with the show so far. "He leadeth me beside the still waters, he resoreth my strength, and yea, though I walk through the valley of death ...." Isn't Charlie Lazarus?

Anyhow, I'm happy the show is back. Anyone else think the plane is an actual key to something? That Kate is still lying?


 o
RE: Lost

Chris - just to clarify, her name is Danielle.

I think your biblical references are fascinating. I certainly have given thought to what some of the names mean but I didn't think of the bible. Shepard...wow!

Interestingly enough, we don't know everyone's real name - Sawyer's and Hurley's aren't real and we don't know what they are yet.

I like Rose. She's not too "biblical" for me. I think on what hand she is a little nuts thinking her husband is still alive, but bear in mind it might be a way for the writers to keep alive the idea that there are other survivors on the other side of the island so they can write it in later. But besides all that, I think she is the Rock of the group, she represents the having faith part, because without faith there is zero hope. I mean, what did people during the Holocaust do? People dealing right now with the trauma of the tsunami? During such times the questions about God comes up. Well, you have to have some kind of faith, trust, belief, whatever you want to call it. Everyone on the island seems to have a role and that is Rose's role, to have enough faith for everyone.

As for Kate, why couldn't she just walk into the bank and ask for that safe deposit box if she had the key? Why go through all this hoopla of romancing some guy who she clearly doesn't love, convince him to rob a bank and then go thru the motions of carrying out the plan, all just to get to some box? BTW, I *KNEW* when the envelope was opened it was going to be some dinky nostalgic item, nothing truly valuable. Interesting that it was a plane... kind of comes full circle, huh??

I don't think she's lying bc a) I think inherently she's honest, when Sawyer asked if it was her suitcase, she said no. She could have said yes. b) I think she feels something for Jack so I doubt she would lie to him.

I thought she was going to say it belonged to "the man she loved, her father." That doesn't mean that it's not her father.

Lastly, what's the "sexual preference" reference? You mean when Shannon asked Boone if Locke was his new boyfriend? I think she was being sarcastic, like just meaning that he was spending a lot of time with him. I say cute things like this to DH! I don't think she was inferring that Boone was gay.


 o
RE: Lost

Sorry about the Delenn name thing. From too much reading of Television without pity I've gotten into the habit of calling characters by the names of characters for which the actors are most known. But there you go, we have Danielle in the Lions Den.

Kate said she didn't have the right signiture to gain access to the lockbox.


 o
RE: Lost

moongirl, I'm curious to know how u figured out it was some memorabilia in the enveloppe? I had her down for a will or last testament or something. Something to clear her name. Some sort of evidence... Isn't it interesting how our perception of her changes so many time? We like her, we hate her, we completely trust her, then not. We see her with Jack, then with the antagonist.

I mentioned the 'sexual preference' thing because I feel strongly that she was indeed referring to Boone's identity. She didn't just say 'Is he your boyfriend, or something' but rather 'Is he your NEW boyfriend', which to me hints that there had been others.

p.s. I'm really impressed that you all have memorized their NAMES, 'cause all I can remember is Jack, Kate, Locke and Danielle!)


 o
RE: Lost

Yeah, Chris, I think Kate is still lying or not telling the whole truth. I can't figure why the marshall would be carrying around the little plane (even if it were evidence, would it be in his possession like that?). There has to be more to it then she's saying.

Any one else routing for Kate and Sawyer (boy is he a cutey or what!) to get together. I love their chemistry, and what about that kiss a while back!!! That Jack is already getting on my nerves. Why does he think he has some right to know what's in the briefcase (just 'cause he helped her find the key?). Oh yeah, and possibly letting Saywer "die" over the breifcase...come on, threating for Shannon's medicine was one thing, but because you're curious about a briefcase? Give it a rest. It's almost like he's a bigger bully now than Sawyer.

Oh, and I thought Shannon and Sayid surprising seemed like a cute couple too.

ps. I saw Kate (well, the actress) on a commercial late at night for "Live Links"--where singles can call and talk to each other. Just sort of funny to see her in a commercial. Anyone else catch it?


 o
RE: Lost

No, I didn't catch that commercial! But I'm betting she'll be popping up on Cover Girl or Maybelline commercials any day now. She's so fresh-faced and really pretty and she's such a hot commodity. I bet she's got tons of offers on her lap as we speak.

Yes I did get the "new" boyfriend reference, and I thought that for split second. But I still think should could have been just flinging around a cutesy comment. I say things like that to my hubby all the time! Meaning, just someone new you're spending time with. If Boone was hanging with one of the girls I could equally picture Shannon saying, "Is she your new girlfriend?" But alas, we don't know what their relationship is yet or their backstory, but supposedly they're getting to it soon.

Re the airplane, I dunno how I knew. It was a hunch I guess. Because, when the pseudo-boyfriend/robber said, "You staged this whole thing to get into a box!" I guess it dawned on me, it was going to be something that held more personal meaning. I didn't know what it was going to be, and I certainly had no idea it would be a toy airplane, but somehow I imagined it being something nostalgic, I thought perhaps it was a memento from her childhood. The reason it could be in the case is - assuming she fled the scene, she grabbed what she needed (after all she knew at that point the law would be chasing her): guns for protection, some money, and the airplane in the envelope. When the marshall caught her, I imagine he put all the stuff he found on her into the case. Now, being that the airplane was all she truly wanted out of the heist, she has been waiting a long time to get her hands on it, to hold it. So it was a big deal to her to finally have it.

Here's the thing tho - I don't recall her saying that she doesn't have the signature, but even still. Let's assume the guy is dead, since she claims she killed him. It seemed very easy for her to fake her ID to pretend she needed a loan, couldn't it have been just as easy to pretend to be a relative of the dead guy and prove it by showing she had the key? Couldn't she then have simply said, "I'm a long lost relative and I'm here to collect his personal effects?"


 o
RE: Lost

First off,the thing about the plane in the suitcase.
I seem to remember that the envelope it was in said 'Personal Effects' on it.Or is it 'Affects'?
Anyway,I think the Marshall just took it from her when he captured her.
But all the talk about names is relevant to me on another score.This is really weirding me out.Almost a month ago,in a post,I called Kate 'Maggie'.Then I either saw the characters name or remembered it but I posted again to correct myself.
In the Bank,she was going by the name 'Maggie'.
Now,maybe somewhere in a previous show she called herself Maggie,like on the farm in Australia,but I don't remember it if she did.
Kate and Maggie are common character names and maybe this is just coincidence,but it's got me spooked.Not like I think I'm clairvoyant or something,but this is such a weird show anyway and to have something weird like this happen just gets to me.
Any help? Does anybody remember the name Maggie coming up before?


 o
RE: Lost

Hmmmm...nope, I don't. That's weird, Jray. But she called herself Anne on the farm, I believe.

I agree, she just took all those things with her and then when the marshall captured her he threw all those things into the case.

Here's another thing - who were those people dead in the chairs in the water? Why would a suitcase that, presumably, would be under the marshall's chair, be down there under THOSE people?

Here's a crazy idea - I think maybe it was Kate and the marshall down there, you can't tell, their faces were so disfigured, but it could have been them and they're really dead, going with the "purgatory" theory. So the case was under their chairs. Also, I think the writers planted the clues earlier on, when you see her give him the oxygen on the plane, it shows that she cared (for whatever reason) about his welfare, and then the couple under the water, the girl is holding the man's hand, as if to comfort him or something.

Or...it could just be that the case went flying around like everything else on the plane and landed in the water.
We'll never know....


 o
RE: Lost

Moongirl, you have officially creeped me out with that interpretation. I've chills running up my spine.

Hey, maybe she was a rogue U.S. Marshall and schrapnel-in-the-chest-guy was a former lover?


 o
RE: Lost

I take it that people usually put their cases and extra stuff under the seat in front on them on planes. Therefore, those people were probably sitting in front of the Marshall and Kate. Either that, or it may have gone flying around during the crash as someone suggested.

I dind't think the couple was Kate and the Marshall. I think the reason we saw Kate giving the Marshal oxygen was so we would know that even though Kate had done something illeagal, she was still a decent person, and personally I think most people may be holding hands in that scenario.

Then again, with this show you never know.

ps. Kate did say something about not being the matching signature, and in that case, if someone where dead I believe a death certificate would be needed and then only the person assigned on the will or the power of attorney of the dead guy would be able to get into the box.


 o
RE: Lost

ditto on creeping me out, moongirl! What HAVE you been smokin'??! lol

And what about what she says to Jack about "It belonged to the man I loved/killed" (I can't remember the exact woids...) Could that person have been her father, not a lover?


 o
RE: Lost

I don't think she was talking about her Father.
Your Father can be A man you love,but when a woman says THE man she loved,it almost always refers to a husband or boyfriend/lover,indicating Romantic love as opposed to familial or platonic love.
EEEUUUWWWWW,that's sounds pompous when I read it back......Oh,well.

Jray,
Professor Emeritus in his own mind


 o
RE: Lost

I agree. I THOUGHT she was going to spit out that it belonged to her father but when she came out and said "the man I loved" I figure he has to be someone else. You can love your father but that kind of statement sounds more romantic, more intimate.

Interesting thought - doesn't the plane look kind of old? It has propellers. Like a military plane or something.

I agree that the idea behind the oxygen mask was to show that Kate was a decent person, after all, she didn't rob the bank to get money, she robbed it to get the airplane. But hey, you never know. Let's just say they are in purgatory, the writers could be giving us clues all along that we don't even know are clues. The girl in the water did have long flowing hair. And they were sitting in the same seats as Kate and the marshall. But I agree that could be anybody. I suppose we will find out eventually!


 o
RE: Lost

I looked at the tape of the episode and the woman has light hair. In the water it looked lighter than Sawyers.

FWIW, They had a discontinuity glitch with the oxygen masks. I noticed with approval that she followed procedure and put hers on first. But a couple of cuts later, when she is putting the Marshall's on, she isn't wearing hers.

Chris,
She who pays way too much attention to this stuff.


 o
RE: Lost

They say the Devil is in the details,Chris.LOL

Moongirl,I don't remeember seeing props on the plane,but in the first episode,when Jack is first coming around,there is a Jet Engine still attached to a piece of wing sitting on the beach.It's running and some poor guy wanders in front of it in a daze and gets sucked in,which explodes the engine,sending pieces flying everywhere.


 o
RE: Lost

What the ____ is going on? Shannon's death is nothing but a desire in her boyfriend/brother's head? That monster lets people realize what it is they truely want in life? They should name it Puff the magic dragon. I'm so bummed. I was happy when that coniving witch got eaten by that thing, and boom, she's back. Locke's the first person to have seen it. I wonder what it showed him that he wanted.


 o
RE: Lost

OK then, that was different. I'm not 100% sure the monster lets them realize what they want, but rather what they need to get on with their lives...Boone needed to see that he had to get over his infactuation with Shannon. Did Jack "see" the monster? Wasn't his father hallucination similar?

Then again, who knows. Maybe Shannon really is dead and there's a fake clone walking around in her place--just kidding, but you never know with this show.

Anyone else notice Saywer at the police station when Boone was there? Guess this could be the start of how they are all connected.. A lot of them seem to have run-ins with the law.

And, what's up with the compass being off?

Strange, strange episode, but glad I watched.


 o
RE: Lost

rudy...Hopefully it was obviously to you that my "OK then, that was different" comment was directed at the episode, not your post. LOL


 o
RE: Lost

Another great episode.

So... if Shannon didn't really die, does this mean the scooped up pilot didn't either... or simply did not exist?

What are your thoughts about that trap door in the ground? Could it lead to some underground community or research facility?

I sort of got the hint from next week's previews that the young boy who faces yet another polar bear will get his wish as well... to find the hero in his dad.

I LOOOOOOOOOOVE the way this show plays with our minds like rag dolls! Hmmm, wonder if David Lynch is one of the producers... lol


 o
RE: Lost

Rudy, I think you missed the point of the episode. I think the whole key is Locke. He has some kind of power. The way he showed Charlie he can get over his demons, he did the same thing with Boone. He showed Boone that he needs to get over his possessive feelings toward Shannon, to let her go. Boone's halucination was his true feelings taking form. In his halucination a) he is protective over Shannon and b) the monster I think represents his fears or demons, the stuff he needs to face. Locke didn't know what kind of halucination Boone would have, but he knew that whatever it was would teach Boone what he needed to learn, and ultimately, Boone would come out of it learning that he has to let Shannon go. I don't think Locke knows about their history but I think he knows that Boone's possessive over her is holding Boone back.

As for Shannon, she is royally f#&!*d up! She plays mind games with people, including Boone. She only thinks of herself and does not think about consequences or the affects her actions will have on people. I think part of Boone's lesson is that he needed to realize that he is better off without her. I think Locke knows this, I think he knows that Boone can be better than he is.

But how does Locke KNOW all these things? He did the same thing with Charlie! It's like he thinks on a whole other level.


 o
RE: Lost

Moongirl, I don't think the series is far enough along where there's supposed to be a point yet. So far the info we have been given has been vague. I like that they are leaving a lot up to conjecture. It's one of the few shows that makes people actually think. It's a refreshing change from all this mindless stuff that your average ADHD teenager watches.

I think Locke "knows" these thing because he was the first one to encounter the monster in the pilot episode. Maybe once he had his experience, he realized that it was so beneficial to him that he wanted other people to experience it as well to see what their result would be. Locke has done nothing that suggest he has powers. He could simply be a wise, experienced outdoorsman with a mysterious face. Maybe he's more. I don't think we'll know for awhile. Suits me fine. I like being kept guessing.


 o
RE: Lost

I'm not as enthusiastic about the episode as some of you. First of all, I really don't want Sayid and Shannon to hook up. He deserves better. (did you all know the actor is married to Barbara Hershey?) Somehow, the episode was just a bit too unsubtle for my tastes. I don't know that I'm ready to have the nitty gritty of the island secrets unfold before me.

The compass bit has me flummoxed. It would be off that much if they were at or close to the north pole - the magnetic pole is not at the geographical pole - which fits with the polar bear. But I think not. If a large electromagnetic field lies beneath the porthole Locke has found, that could account for it - assuming Sayid didn't move very much around the island as he studied the compass.

A large magnetic rock, a very large magnetic rock, might do it.

Ah, the joys of a thoughtful show.


 o
RE: Lost

Well, now after seeing the episode I'm not sure I want to see Sayid and Shannon hook up either. Before the episode, I thought Shannon was a just a little spoiled, but now I see that she's a little witch.

Chris, I believe you about the relationship, but isn't Barbara Hersey a little old for him?

Now get this, I was reading the summary over on ABC's site and they said that Locke told Boone that the concoction Locke put on Boone's head was a hallucinogenic that caused Boone to have his vision. OK, I don't remember Locke specifically telling Boone that. That would mean that the monster and the island have nothing to do with it and that is was Locke. (Did I miss something?) I wonder if the site summarizer is taking liberties, or if they know something we don't. Then again, they could jsut be wrong, but I would think ABC's site should have the correct summary.

Here is a link that might be useful: ABC - Lost


 o
RE: Lost

I don't think Locke said that it was actually a hallucinogenic, all he said was, "is that what it made you see?" He could be talking about the substance, he could be talking about the Island itself, if indeed it has powers and Locke knows what they are, since he claims he "looked into the eyes of the island and saw something beautiful." He could be talking about who knows what? Everything on this show is so vague!

What's important to note tho, is that Locke now did the same things for Michael in last night's episode, where he helped him overcome his fears of letting Walt grow up.

Naveen Andrews isn't married to Barbara Hershey, they've been together for 6 years tho, they live together. Apparently he likes "older women." Read it in People (ok, I never read that trash, but there I was in the dentist's office) I flipped when I realized he is the Indian in the film The English Patient! I didn't recgnize him without his turbin! What I love tho, is that he said, regarding Sayid and Shannon, "I hope it gives middle America something to talk about."

Back to last night's episode - it's the kid! Walt has powers, which I have pondered for some time now. Back in the 2nd episode, he was looking at the polar bear in the comic book and then the polar bear showed up. The thing I DON'T get tho, is, what makes him special? It's not like he has special parents or anything, I mean, it's not like he was born to Mary and Joseph. Then again, they were ordinary folk, too. Funny that we had been discussing the Twilight Zone with Billy Mummy on another thread, bc Walt reminded me of that.

I wonder what it will all mean and if Walt will be the opposite of what the baby is destined to be.


 o
RE: Lost

Moongirl, I missed the polar bear in the comic book (although I perfer to call them graphic novels :D ) as possibly calling forth for Walt the real polar bear. I had begun to suspect that the comic book told the story of the island. It did look like it had a number of elements of "Lost." Is that where everything comes from on the island via Walt? He had been reading the comic book from the beginning.

I think it interesting that Walt's adopted father was afraid of him. And you are right, for this episode, Walt seemed very like the Mummy character from the classic Twilight Zone episode.

Oops, my mistake about the non-marraige. I'd read about Sayid being Kit from "The English Patient" and hadn't recognized him either.


 o
RE: Lost

Ok, I've missed a few episodes here and there (and they keep having darn repeats!), but I watched last night.

Do you think Walt is a positive force or a negative one? After all, he didn't want to study birds of Australia and one crashes into the window. Then, his mom is ignoring him, and all of a sudden she starts to feel ill, then gets a blood disease and is dead in a week. Hmm! Is his real name Damien? LOL

I'd always wondered about Locke's legs. He was in the wheelchair, then he was walking. Does he have prosthetics, or was it subliminal like someone mentioned?

Just trying to fill in some blanks til I can catch repeats of my "lost" episodes.


 o
RE: Lost

I think I'm the only one in the United States that finds "Lost" not worth watching and very convoluted. Sorry I tried watching but couldn't.


 o
RE: Lost

Well for those of you following the comic book concept, I went on the ABC site and learned from some REALLY insane Lost fans that the comic book is actually a real comic book, it's the Green Lantern. AND apparently it has been said that the writers chose this comic book for very specific reasons (of course they won't say what) Here is a link of the actual comic book, in English:

http://www.livejournal.com/community/scans_daily/193624.html#cutid1


 o
RE: Lost

Thanks! I copied the three pages shown onto a document for safe keeping.

Minnie -- when my husband first turned on the show it didn't appeal to me and I went to sleep before the episode was over. After giving it a second chance I now enjoy it very much. When they re-run the series in the future you might try watching from the beginning.


 o
RE: Lost

I might watch it in reruns some day. Maybe after everyone knows what the plot is and tells me ahead of time. I don't mind spoilers.


 o
RE: Lost

Just a reminder...I think there's a new Lost episode tonight!


 o
RE: Lost

Oh God! It's about time! I'd just about HAD IT with the reruns!!

That Ethan is some spooky! Like a robot or superhuman android. I wonder how they're going to get out of this situation...


 o
RE: Lost

I missed so many of the earlier episodes and am trying to make sense of what I have seen so far - sometimes it is hard LOL! I will watch tonight to see if it starts making sense to me...

Pat


 o
RE: Lost

I can't wait! It is definitely hard to follow if you miss episodes bc there are so many little details, like when you're reading Harry Potter for example, all these little nuances and connections and things you notice or don't notice until later, or if you miss one, then you don't pick up on it later...also another thing is, much of this series is not told through third person, in other words, each story is seen through different characters' eyes, so if you miss one ep, it's like you missed a particular perspective or backstory, which is intergral to the whole experience.

If you want to catch up on the episodes you can visit abc. They have a log of each episode up to date, very detailed. It helps.


 o
RE: Lost

I was a little disappointed with the episode. Again, nothing really happened but I wasn't left wanting more like usual. I found the flashback story with Charlie too predictable. And, we already know that Charlie has turned over a new leaf from his drug doing days and that he really likes Claire and will do anything for her...do we have to rehash it over and over again? And, so they shot Ethan. There's probably ten more just like him, and we'll have to go through the same thing again 5 weeks from now. Why don't stick to digging up that big thing they can't seem to get into?

The episode for next week (a possible love triangle) looks a little more promising. I personally seem to enjoy the episodes with Sawyer in them the most.


 o
RE: Lost

Well, you know what, carla35, last night I dreamt that there were actually more of them, as in more ETHANS, or replicants on the island. Hmmm, do I smell experimental cloning?


 o
RE: Lost

I think the teasers always promise more than the show actually delivers. However, I still enjoy it. I keep wondering how long this show will last. How long they can keep a story line going. Maybe that's why they're dragging out the box or whatever.


 o
RE: Lost

I was a little surprised to see more of Charlie's backstory, too. It didn't add any more to his character development, but it did give him a motive for doing the incredibly stupid thing of killing Ethan before Sayid had a chance to torture the truth out of him.


 o
RE: Lost

I don't know, Chris. I think I agree with what Charlie said, that no amount of torture would have made Ethan tell them any information.

As many times as he was knocked down he bounced back up again. Shooting him was probably the only way to stop him, but hey, we may never know for sure.

And yes, I won't be a bit surprised if more folks show up that weren't on the airplane's manifest.

Carla, I also enjoy those episodes where Sawyer has a bigger part -- hmmm ... I wonder why ;-)


 o
RE: Lost

I agree, so I won't repeat what you all said.

Here's something - did anyone notice the OTHER castaways in the background? There were a couple of pans where there was a woman on the side of the frame and then a couple, a man and a woman.

Who are these people??? And what happened to Rose?


 o
RE: Lost

Well, there are 48 minus one surviver and, what, 12 in the central ensemble with actual lines?


 o
RE: Lost

I believe there are 14 MAIN characters. There are theories going around that the 14 represent the 7 sins and the 7 virtues.

But we lost a few people. Joanna, the swimmer, the marshall, a few red shirts...

But who are the other people? And where has Rose gone? I am irritated that they don't even show her in the background.


 o
RE: Lost

And another thing that keeps creeping forward from the back of my mind: the part where the pilot gets gobbled up by 'The Thing' (for lack of a better term). He seems to be the only one attacked/eaten or killed. I wonder how come? Did he 'know too much'?


 o
RE: Lost

Hmm.. that's an interesting theory. The producers refer to that Thing as The Monster, which is not the same as the Polar Bear. Several of the castaways have seen the monster. Locke saw it and thought it was beautiful, so keep that in mind.


 o
RE: Lost

Crap!! I'm trying to watch Lost at work. The phone rang at the wrong time. Did Sawyer kill the wrong guy?? HELP!!


 o
RE: Lost

Crap! Me too! I was trying to watch it in my living room. The phone rang... it was a long-distance from my mum.
I missed that part tooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!
All I saw was the shot, then Sawyer bending over him...
What did the man say?


 o
RE: Lost

Spoiler Alert: Don't read if you don't want to know what happened!

Sawyer was set up. He shot a guy who owed his old pal money. It wasn't the original Sawyer at all. Disappointingly enough, I think we all saw that one coming. How interesting was it that it was Jack's dad who, unknowingly, encouraged him to go back and do it.


 o
RE: Lost

Yes, now we have to see the end to that story. Does Sawyer go back and kill Jack's dad? Does he have a fight with him? Why does Sawyer get arrested (we see him getting dragged thru the police station during Boone's episode) He had to have done something but obviously we haven't been told what yet. Does he ever find the real Sawyer?

Also, will Sawyer ever get 100% confirmation that the man in the bar is Jack's dad (he must have an idea but truly, there's no way for him to know for sure, or is there??) And if he does piece it together, will Sawyer ever tell Jack what the father expressed about his gratefulness to his son?


 o
RE: Lost

Didn't I see somewhere that eventually all the characters will be tied together? Perhaps this is the beginning?


 o
RE: Lost

So many questions... And now Sawyer has also heard the whispering voices. That makes 2, with Sayid.


 o
RE: Lost

What if the real Sawyer is Locke??? LOL

moongirl, I noticed you mentioned that Locke said "the monster" was beautiful. It seems like I recall reading that somewhere, but I can't recall actually seeing it happen on tv. Do you (or anyone) remember when he actually said it and to who? Thanks.


 o
RE: Lost

Didn't Sawyer say he'd never killed a man during the drinking game? I don't think he'd go back and kill Jack's father, but why didn't he tell Jack about the encounter? I got the impression, in an earlier episode, that Jack's father drank himself to death.


 o
RE: Lost

blackcat,

If I recall correctly Sawyer did "say" he never killed a man, but then he drank (which meant he actually did kill a man). I think it was the only time they both drank.

I too agree that I don't think Sawyer would go back and kill Jack's father, but I could see him going back and killing the old friend who set him up. I think Sawyer probably thinks the guy he met was Jack's dad, but I take it that since Sawyer has nothing to gain by telling Jack, he might as well keep it to himself. I take it Sawyer's a 'knowledge is power' type of person and may be able to use the info. at a later time to his advantage.


 o
RE: Lost

Carla, I agree with your description of the drinking game challenge; he made the statement, "I never killed a man," and Kate drank, then Sawyer drank too which meant it was also true for him.

I also agree that Sawyer now strongly suspects that he met Jack's dad, but it doesn't serve his purposes to mention it yet.


 o
RE: Lost

Did anyone notice that when Jin went for his first discussion at the man's house the little girl's tv had Hurley on it or at least someone that looked just like him? Odd than Hurley would be on tv there. This show seems to come up with some really strange things.


 o
RE: Lost

Well nothing the writers do on this show is random, they do everything for a reason.

To add the discussion -

yes, Sawyer drank, indicating that he, too has killed a man. It was supposed to be a Whoa! moment when you realize they both have killed. The question, is who did SHE kill? Was it the man she said she loved? Maybe it's merely the guy she shot in the bank robbery. Maybe there's more than one. Notice btw, that episode was called "Outlaws" - and to further this idea, sawyer claimed his name was Jesse, he killed Frank the Shrimp guy and the guy who set him up was named James. Hmmm...Frank and Jesse James. I told you, nothing the writers do is random.

I loved this last episode, lots of good revealing and emotions. Did you all catch that the little girl's puppy was the one he gave Sun back during her episode?

Also, what I loved was the blood on the hands in the bathroom scene. In her episode we see her leave and we think he's an SOB. But here we get to see him in there, after she leaves and how he starts crying.

My quesion is: WHY WHY WHY did he say it was too late? I kept wishing he would go over and make amends with her but now it's too late. is it bc of the weight of everything he's been thru and the guilt? Or does he think the rift between them is too deep to go back?

My last thought about this show is be patient. People seem to be complaining that it's losing them. It has dropped to #10 on the top most watched shows (as opposed to #3 where it was in the beginning.) DH and I were discussing how it is hard to keep that same momentum up when you have 14 characters and lots of stories to tell. It all isn't going to get shown in an hour. I think it's still great!

On and yes, it was Hurley on Korean TV. DH caught it and we replayed it back on Tivo. Everyone is talking about it!

SPOILER AHEAD!!!!

The ABC website posts the synopsis for each upcoming episode. For the next one, called "Numbers" we'll get to see Hurley's backstory (finally!) It says that something happens to him that changes his life, something most Americans dream of. Now, all over the Lost websites, there is the rumor that he wins the lottery. Could be....but here's my question. Let's say he does, still, why would he be on Korean TV? Lots of people in America win the lottery, that doesn't make them international news. Maybe he invents something...who knows. But if the lottery thing is true, well then there's the inside joke when Walt says, "Hurley owes me $83,000." Well, we'll find out next week, won't we!?


 o
RE: Lost

I still think it's all connections and more connections. Now we have Sawyer and Jack connected and Hurley and Jin and Sun. Wonder who will be next?


 o
RE: Lost

Totally missed Hurley on TV - and I've already taped over it. Drat! I loved the way the music at the end of the episode stopped. I tend to forget we are listening to Hurley's portable system.

So why did Jin take the beating? He wasn't guilty of anything and we know he knows how to fight. It wasn't shame over beating that little girls father, because he tore into Walt that time on the beach.

How significant was it that Sun switched to English to tell him she had wanted to leave him? Could he understand? Did that contribute to the "Too late" decision?


 o
RE: Lost

I must admit, I keep waiting for Jin to start speaking English.


 o
RE: Lost

yes! I wondered the same thing too - about Sun saying "I was going to leave you!" in English. Did he understand her? Or was it simply a safe way for her to get it off her chest?


 o
RE: Lost

I was also wondering why Sun was shouting at Jin in English if he doesn't understand more than a couple of words of English. I asked a Korean friend to watch this week and see if the Korean words that are not subtitled give any important information. I'm hoping she'll get hooked on Lost too!

I noticed Hurley on the TV. I wondered what the program was or if he was on a commercial.


 o
RE: Lost

Well, if he does become famous, perhaps he was on TV because of that. It looked like he was getting in or out of a car.

I don't think Jin truly understood her. First of all, if her intention was for her to understand her, she'd first have to KNOW that he understands English. Now if he knew English - and she also did but he didn't know that - why would they have conversations like, "What do you think is going on with everyone else on the island?" and the whole fiasco with the raft would never have happened bc Jin would have been able to explain himself to Michael.

No, like I said, I think it was a safe way for her to get it off her chest. I think she was busting to tell him but at the same time scared to REALLY tell him.


 o
RE: Lost

I must admit, I keep waiting for Jin to start speaking English.


 o
RE: Lost

I'm a latecomer to this series and still trying to understand what is what & who is who LOL!
My take on Jin was that he didn't deny or resist being beaten because he thought he deserved it after they showed that flashback with him washing all that blood off himself. He did what was asked of him by beating the man to prevent him from being shot-but that he hated himself for doing it and hated what he had become.

Pat


 o
RE: Lost

Holy cow that was a good episode!!! While I suppose it was a tad predictable, that last bit was a good gotcha. Nothing better than a good gotcha. The first three numbers are my lotto numbers...maybe I should change them.

How did Locke know it was Claire's birthday? She didn't mention it until the cradle was almost built.


 o
RE: Lost

The Frence woman was sure a lot nicer to Hurley than she was to Sahid. Do you suppose she will eventually join them? Are those numbers going to show up somehow in everyone's life?


 
 

 

 


Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.



iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network